<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Charlie Wilson&#8217;s War	</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chrispramas.com/2007/12/11/charlie-wilsons-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chrispramas.com/2007/12/11/charlie-wilsons-war/</link>
	<description>The Furious Scribblings of Chris Pramas</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.10</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispramas.com/2007/12/11/charlie-wilsons-war/#comment-598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrispramas.com/?p=197#comment-598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The backlash from training the jihadis was worth it.  Bye bye USSR!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The backlash from training the jihadis was worth it.  Bye bye USSR!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arnulfe		</title>
		<link>http://www.chrispramas.com/2007/12/11/charlie-wilsons-war/#comment-597</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arnulfe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chrispramas.com/?p=197#comment-597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I caught an advance screening last week. I&#039;m a Philip Seymour Hoffman fanboy, and he was brilliant as the jaded CIA agent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The story itself isn&#039;t very compelling, so the film leans heavily on solid performances by the leads and its relevance to modern politics.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As far as its political agenda, the film plays it safe, offering up a few subtle references for both war-mongers and peaceniks alike, but doesn&#039;t make any bold pronouncements.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There was a somewhat jarring contrast between the period newsreel footage (which I recognized from a documentary we produced in the 80&#039;s) and the CGI-enhanced FPS-shooter-style footage of Hind gunships mowing down Afghan villagers. This juxtaposition was perhaps the strongest &quot;statement&quot; made in the entire film.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught an advance screening last week. I&#8217;m a Philip Seymour Hoffman fanboy, and he was brilliant as the jaded CIA agent.</p>
<p>The story itself isn&#8217;t very compelling, so the film leans heavily on solid performances by the leads and its relevance to modern politics.</p>
<p>As far as its political agenda, the film plays it safe, offering up a few subtle references for both war-mongers and peaceniks alike, but doesn&#8217;t make any bold pronouncements.</p>
<p>There was a somewhat jarring contrast between the period newsreel footage (which I recognized from a documentary we produced in the 80&#8217;s) and the CGI-enhanced FPS-shooter-style footage of Hind gunships mowing down Afghan villagers. This juxtaposition was perhaps the strongest &#8220;statement&#8221; made in the entire film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
